Monday, March 08
News Aggregation Center | Social Listening Post
Like Haha Love Sad Angry
 
Kritik
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Categories
    • Arts and Literature
    • Banking and Financial
    • Business Services
    • Campaign
    • Consumer Products
    • Current Affairs
    • Economics
    • Education
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Beverage
    • Healthcare
    • International Affairs
    • Kritik’s Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Lifestyle
    • Opinion
    • Personal Development
    • Politics
    • Public Services
    • Science & Technology
    • Service Providers
    • Social Issues
    • Sports
    • Tourism and Hospitality
    • Transportation
    • Travel and Leisure
    • Utilities
    • Others
  • Hot Topics
  • Video
  • Contact Us
  • Feedback
  • FAQ?
user avatar
Register Log In
critique, kritik

Think You Make Smart Decisions? Don’t Be So Sure

Krit@@dm1N kritik
2 years ago
209 views

Jeff Stibel | Columnist, USA Today | Published on April 15, 2019

What did you eat for dinner last night and why? Who did you vote for in the last election? Why did you choose to marry your husband or wife? These are questions to which the majority of us could provide reasonable answers. But what if you are wrong—what if someone else made those decisions for you?

In a series of experiments, psychologist Petter Johansson demonstrated that unseen forces can heavily influence our decisions, and our reasoning is sometimes only used to justify our decisions in hindsight. His research suggests that we are in far less control of our decisions than we may think, and that people can be made to change their minds about all kinds of things. 

In one experiment, Johansson asked participants to decide which people they found more attractive by showing them a series of pictures of people printed on index cards. The participants were asked to choose between two faces. After they made their selection, Johansson used a sleight of hand to give participants the card they did not pick but asked them to explain why they chose that particular face. Over 80% of the participants did not notice that Johansson had switched the cards, and proceeded to give detailed explanations of why they preferred the face they didn’t actually prefer. What’s more, when Johansson let participants make the choice again, they uniformly chose the face they did not choose the first time.

People were tricked into changing their minds and had no idea it had happened. Johansson and his colleagues labeled this phenomenon “choice blindness,” meaning that sometimes we are blind to our own choices and preferences. 

You may be thinking that choosing between two faces on cards is pretty inconsequential, and that choice blindness surely wouldn’t hold for more important matters. Johansson did another experiment of more magnitude a few years later. This time he gave participants a chart and asked them to rank where they stood on various political issues. Again, he used a trick to completely flip participants’ answers from conservative to liberal and vice versa. This time, 90% of participants failed to detect the switch, and proceeded to justify their fake responses, often reasoning for an opposing political view.  

Researchers have repeated versions of Johansson’s experiments with all kinds of decisions, such as purchasing things as straightforward as jelly and tea, with the same results. All it takes is a little manipulation to make most people choose a different face, a different flavor tea, or a polar opposite political stance. 

The implications are far-reaching. If you are wondering why “fake news” is so dangerous, one reason is that choice blindness makes it easy to trick people’s minds. The most cynical interpretation is that our choices don’t actually matter, that an outside force routinely spins our collective wheels, and that we only justify our decisions after the fact. But as an optimistic brain scientist, I see it differently. 

Johansson’s experiments show that our beliefs are remarkably flexible: we aren’t as rigid in our thinking as we think, and neither are the people around us. If we can get someone to really examine the opposite point of view, and to think as if that view was his or her own, we can change minds.  The old wives’ tale is wise indeed: place yourself in someone else’s shoes before judging. 

Source: https://bit.ly/2Zk6I7W

Categories: Business Services
Post reactions
Like (4)
Haha (0)
Love (0)
Sad (0)
Angry (0)
Related Posts
critique; kritik, critic, newsfeed

Communities prove more valuable than loyalty programs

4 weeks ago
newsfeed, critique, kritik, critic

These are the attributes of resilient companies

4 weeks ago
newsfeed; critic; critique; kritik

Tips for maintaining momentum after making it through 2020

2 months ago
news feed, kritik, critique, critic

Use this road map to start your next business

3 months ago
critic; critique; kritik; newsfeed

Buying a company? Here’s what you need to know

3 months ago
critic; critique; kritik; newsfeed

Digital transformation spending forecast to skyrocket to $6.8 trillion

3 months ago
Recent Posts
  • California startup touts battery-swapping to juice demand for electric vehicles
  • Ushering in new era of smart buildings and healthcare for Singapore
  • Why core values and business model must align
  • LinkedIn co-founder: Success requires the right mindset
  • The right way to conduct a sales analysis
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    Categories
    • Advanced Technology
    • Agriculture
    • Arts & Literature
    • Banking and Financial
    • Business Services
    • Campaign
    • Consumer Products
    • Corporate News
    • Current Affairs
    • Customer Service
    • Cybersecurity
    • Digital Marketing
    • Economics
    • Editorial
    • Education
    • Entertainment
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Food and Beverage
    • Gig Economy
    • Healthcare
    • Human Resource
    • Humor
    • International Affairs
    • Investment
    • Leadership
    • Letters
    • Lifestyle
    • Opinion
    • Others
    • Personal Development
    • Politics
    • Productivity Tools
    • Public Services
    • Sales and Marketing
    • Scandals
    • Science and Technology
    • Service Providers
    • Smart City
    • Social Issues
    • Sports
    • Startup
    • Strategic Management
    • Tourism and Hospitality
    • Transportation
    • Travel and Leisure
    • Utilities
    Login with your Social Account
    Kritik © 2017-2019 ZOHL Web Services | All Rights Reserved.
    A Division of ZOHL Industries Sdn Bhd (351827-A)
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Content Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Disclaimer
    • Contact Us
    • Feed

    This site is best viewed with 1400x900 resolution (all browsers) and with IE 10.0 version only